|
 
- Thread
- 1180
- Digest
- 0
- Credits
- 1529
- Prestige
- 1203
- Purview
- 30
- Joined
- 1-19-2009
|
Teaching Methods
Very little literature exists on the delivery of training programmes designed to encourage
further participation. Marien and Pizam (1997) provide an in-depth analysis of citizen participation
in the planning process. However, many of the techniques are not suitable for
remote marginal communities, for example, they suggest television, e-mail and the internet
to send and gather information –– clearly not appropriate for villages without access
to electricity. Similarly, newspapers and bulletin boards would exclude many who lack
literacy skills. Although many studies refer to the need for capacity building for rural/propoor/
community-based tourism, methods of delivery of such support has received little, if
any, discussion. Villagers in remote marginal communities frequently cannot leave their
homes for long training sessions and do not have the academic qualifications to attend
courses in established educational institutions. Support needs to be of a high quality and
on going nature. As Scheyvens (2003): suggests, “sending a few members on various oneweek
training courses and expecting them to return home and become skilled marketers or
business managers virtually overnight, is simply unrealistic”.
With reference to ecotourism training, the World Wildlife Fund suggests that short, technical
courses have little impact. Longer courses, including learning by doing and on the job
training, have proved more successful. However, such methods would not be best suited to
some aspects of the curriculum discussed earlier. Learning by observing other projects and
places in action can be very fruitful, it would give the villagers an opportunity to be tourists
themselves and appreciate some of the successes and pitfalls of tourism (Cole, 2003).
Focus groups can also be a useful method to transfer knowledge into a community.
Ngadha villagers used focus groups, which I set up for my research, to probe my knowledge
and experience. During the research, villagers frequently complained about culturally
insensitive behaviour by tourists. The focus groups allowed a discussion on this and possible
solutions to the problems. The villagers were able to learn from me what is done
about similar problems in other regions (with a longer history of tourism or greater numbers
of tourists) and discuss whether these solutions would be appropriate in their own setting.
Furthermore, the villagers used the focus groups to glean information about tourism
development and to clarify issues and positions held by officialdom (as they knew I had
interviewed tourism officials at the regency and provincial levels) (Cole, 2004b). |
|